linux-kernel - Re:Re: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: mhi: Keep modem name match with Foxconn T99W640

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <623c5da7.9de2.19ab555133e.Coremail.slark_xiao@163.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:07:22 +0800 (CST)
From: "Slark Xiao" <slark_xiao@....com>
To: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
	johannes@...solutions.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	mani@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: mhi: Keep modem name match with
 Foxconn T99W640


At 2025-11-24 17:53:54, "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 3:31 AM Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> At 2025-11-22 10:08:36, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 19:41:15 +0800 Slark Xiao wrote:
>> >> Correct it since M.2 device T99W640 has updated from T99W515.
>> >> We need to align it with MHI side otherwise this modem can't
>> >> get the network.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: ae5a34264354 ("bus: mhi: host: pci_generic: Fix the modem name of Foxconn T99W640")
>> >> Fixes: 65bc58c3dcad ("net: wwan: mhi: make default data link id configurable")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
>> >
>> >Doesn't apply to either networking tree :(
>> I have cc the email address by the system command
>> "scripts/get_maintainer.pl patch". Do you mean shall I remove
>> netdev@...r.kernel.org by manual?
>
>This means your patch does not apply cleanly to net.git [1] or net-next.git.
>So you have to rebase your change on the net.git tree before resending.
>
>Regards,
>Loic
>
>[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
Hi Loic,
I see. Actually this patch was generated in mhi code base.
But I didn't see any difference of this file between mhi and net.
And, there is another commit may affect this change:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251119105615.48295-3-slark_xiao@163.com/
-	    strcmp(cntrl->name, "foxconn-t99w515") == 0)
+	    strcmp(cntrl->name, "foxconn-t99w515") == 0 ||
+	    strcmp(cntrl->name, "foxconn-t99w760") == 0)

I edited above commit firstly and now it's reviewed status but not applied.
If I update this change based net or net-dev, above T99W760 support 
commit then would have a conflict since they are not a common
series. How shall I do to avoid this potential conflict?

Thanks