lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251124184219.0a34e86e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:42:19 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Slark Xiao" <slark_xiao@....com>
Cc: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
 johannes@...solutions.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, mani@...nel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: mhi: Keep modem name match with Foxconn
 T99W640

On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:07:22 +0800 (CST) Slark Xiao wrote:
> I see. Actually this patch was generated in mhi code base.
> But I didn't see any difference of this file between mhi and net.
> And, there is another commit may affect this change:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251119105615.48295-3-slark_xiao@163.com/
> -	    strcmp(cntrl->name, "foxconn-t99w515") == 0)
> +	    strcmp(cntrl->name, "foxconn-t99w515") == 0 ||
> +	    strcmp(cntrl->name, "foxconn-t99w760") == 0)
> 
> I edited above commit firstly and now it's reviewed status but not applied.
> If I update this change based net or net-dev, above T99W760 support 
> commit then would have a conflict since they are not a common
> series. How shall I do to avoid this potential conflict?

Are you saying you have to concurrent submissions changing one file?
If yes please repost them as a series.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ