[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d689e03e-0f20-4a33-bd74-6cf342f92485@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 11:23:14 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...gle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/namespace: correctly handle errors returned by
grab_requested_mnt_ns
On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 07:15:16AM -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 4:51 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > listmount04.c:128: TFAIL: invalid mnt_id_req.spare expected EINVAL: EBADF (9)
> The merged patch is slightly different from what you can see on the
> mailing list, so it's better to look at commit 78f0e33cd6c93
> ("fs/namespace: correctly handle errors returned by
> grab_requested_mnt_ns") to understand what is going on here.
> With this patch, the spare field can be used as the `mnt_ns_fd`. EINVAL
> is returned if both mnt_ns_fd and mnt_ns_id are set. A non-zero
> mnt_ns_fd (the old spare) is interpreted as a namespace file descriptor.
I can see what's happening - the question is if the test failure it
triggers is a problem in the kernel or in the test.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists