[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202511241612.6CF90E9@keescook>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:29:52 -0800
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() and family
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:35:12PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Those macros are illegible. And 99% of all users DO NOT WANT ANY OF
> THAT COMPLEXITY.
Okay, I think you're saying "I don't want the common helpers to include
the infrastructure for supporting the ..._sz() variants"?
> So no. We're not doing *any* of that. You make it simple and targeted
> to the *common* case, of you don't do this at all. Because that
> over-designed mess that actually turned some users *less* readable,
> but one line shorter, was bad.
Fair enough. Looking at the treewide change I prepared[1], it's less
than 1% of those mechanical replacements:
$ git show f79ee96ad6a3 | grep -E 'k.*alloc_(objs?|flex)\(' | wc -l
17473
$ git show f79ee96ad6a3 | grep '_sz(' | wc -l
114
I'll respin without the _sz variants, and try to improve the flex stuff.
-Kees
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/commit/?h=dev/v6.18-rc6/alloc_obj/v5
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists