[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251125063358.GA14801@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 07:33:58 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@...il.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
song@...nel.org, yukuai@...as.com, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
kch@...dia.com, jaegeuk@...nel.org, cem@...nel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/6] f2fs: ignore discard return value
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 09:10:00AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Sending these all as a series might be confusing - it would be good
if the individual patches get picked through the subsystem trees
so that the function signature can be cleaned up after -rc1.
Can we get this queued up in the f2fs tree?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists