[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e224b118-6595-4f03-8aad-862e47fde5fa@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:44:25 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>, tony.luck@...el.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, james.clark@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fe@....tdt.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf/x86: Add Airmont NP
On 11/24/2025 3:48 PM, Martin Schiller wrote:
> From the perspective of Intel cstate, PMU and MSR the Airmont NP
> (aka Lightning Mountain) is identical to Airmont.
>
> This changes are taken from patched kernel sources of the MaxLinear SDK
> which can be found at https://github.com/maxlinear/linux
>
> Martin Schiller (3):
> perf/x86/msr: Add Airmont NP
> perf/x86/intel: Add Airmont NP
> perf/x86/cstate: Add Airmont NP
>
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/events/msr.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
The whole patch-set looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists