[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eaaa8b65c7ad8570c4d55eb4162a9d5d@dev.tdt.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:33:47 +0100
From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, james.clark@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fe@....tdt.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf/x86: Add Airmont NP
On 2025-11-25 08:44, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> On 11/24/2025 3:48 PM, Martin Schiller wrote:
>> From the perspective of Intel cstate, PMU and MSR the Airmont NP
>> (aka Lightning Mountain) is identical to Airmont.
>>
>> This changes are taken from patched kernel sources of the MaxLinear
>> SDK
>> which can be found at https://github.com/maxlinear/linux
>>
>> Martin Schiller (3):
>> perf/x86/msr: Add Airmont NP
>> perf/x86/intel: Add Airmont NP
>> perf/x86/cstate: Add Airmont NP
>>
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/events/msr.c | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> The whole patch-set looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks for your review.
Is there anything left I need to do to ensure that these changes get
merged?
Regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists