linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] media: dt-bindings: Add Amlogic V4L2 video decoder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <db18fee8-6117-4356-a212-bfbd9cbcdc05@amlogic.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:45:07 +0800
From: Zhentao Guo <zhentao.guo@...ogic.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] media: dt-bindings: Add Amlogic V4L2 video
 decoder


在 2025/11/25 19:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On 24/11/2025 04:32, Zhentao Guo via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Zhentao Guo <zhentao.guo@...ogic.com>
>>
>> Describe the initial support for the V4L2 stateless video decoder
>> driver used with the Amlogic S4 (S805X2) platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhentao Guo <zhentao.guo@...ogic.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/media/amlogic,s4-vcodec-dec.yaml      | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
>>
>
> Never tested, although maybe you imply this by RFC. If that is the case,
> explain IN THE FIRST paragraph of your cover letter why this is RFC, why
> this is not ready for review and mention that because of this you did
> not test your own code.
This is my fault, I didn't test the dtbs check carefully. This will not 
happen again! The reason for the RFC tag is that there are still some 
Fluster test failures and we are resolving them.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

BRs

Zhentao