[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gbszooz7phjyo26ofhnchmugp6vsi7gk5sqr4hjpcxyoluwac2@3bk2rutk2cof>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:59:31 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@...pur.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, minchan@...nel.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: Fix a spelling mistake
Cc-ing Andrew [message id: 20251125020522.1913-1-chuguangqing@...pur.com]
On (25/11/25 10:05), Chu Guangqing wrote:
> The spelling of the word "relases" is incorrect; it should be "releases".
>
> Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@...pur.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 1a1159a70fb4..5759823d6314 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static int zram_writeback_slots(struct zram *zram,
> index = pps->index;
> zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
> /*
> - * scan_slots() sets ZRAM_PP_SLOT and relases slot lock, so
> + * scan_slots() sets ZRAM_PP_SLOT and releases slot lock, so
> * slots can change in the meantime. If slots are accessed or
> * freed they lose ZRAM_PP_SLOT flag and hence we don't
> * post-process them.
> --
> 2.43.7
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists