[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l5udmggplyatnozipk7tjugkkzwtglckjejq67aa7q4mlywxw4@4vhjkbhjthnn>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:21:39 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Wait for suspend ACK only
if WAIT_FW_READY is set
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 02:49:03PM +0200, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
>
> The DSP suspend path currently waits unconditionally
> for a suspend ack from the firmware.
> This breaks firmwares that do not implement the
> mailbox-based READY handshake, as the DSP never
> responds and system suspend fails with -EBUSY.
>
But if the firmware doesn't implement "mailbox-based READY handshake",
do you still want to send the RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_SYSTEM message?
If so, can you clarify here in the commit message that the firmware
expects the mailbox-based message, and only the "handshake" part should
be omitted.
If that part isn't implemented either, then I think you should fix the
code to not poke the mailbox in the first place.
Also, wrap your commit message at 75 characters, please.
> The driver already uses the WAIT_FW_READY flag to
> indicate that the firmware supports the READY
> handshake at boot. Apply the same logic during
> suspend: only wait for the suspend ack when the
> firmware is expected to support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index fc0470aa72c1..e25dbe32ef79 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -1327,10 +1327,11 @@ static int imx_dsp_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> /*
> - * DSP need to save the context at suspend.
> - * Here waiting the response for DSP, then power can be disabled.
> + * The DSP must save its context during suspend.
Please double check that this comment reflect above conclusion.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + * Wait for a response from the DSP if required before disabling power.
> */
> - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->pm_comp, msecs_to_jiffies(100)))
> + if (priv->flags & WAIT_FW_READY &&
> + !wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->pm_comp, msecs_to_jiffies(100)))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> out:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists