[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mkgc3gpgzvdvotzw4752om5ascwxpscocaj2x5urzaa7ss4iys@rsqb3ebrexw7>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:14:53 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Skip
RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_SYSTEM when mailbox TX channel is uninitialized
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 02:49:02PM +0200, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
>
> Firmwares that do not use mailbox communication
> (e.g., the hello_world sample) leave priv->tx_ch
> as NULL. The current suspend logic unconditionally
> sends RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_SYSTEM, which is invalid without
> an initialized TX channel.
>
> Detect the no_mailboxes case early and skip sending
> the suspend message. Instead, proceed directly to
> the runtime PM suspend path, which is the correct
> behavior for firmwares that cannot respond to mailbox
> requests.
Please use the allotted 75 characters of width for your commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index f11662f9a12f..fc0470aa72c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -1308,6 +1308,15 @@ static int imx_dsp_suspend(struct device *dev)
> if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
> goto out;
>
> + /*
> + * No channel available for sending messages;
> + * indicates no mailboxes present, so trigger PM runtime suspend
> + */
> + if (!priv->tx_ch) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No initialized mbox tx channel\n");
Commit message and comment above says this is "normal" behavior,
dev_err() indicates that it's not. Should this be a dev_info()?
That said, it's still a message every time you suspend, so perhaps even
omitting the print (or a dev_dbg()) makes more sense?
Regards,
Bjorn
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> reinit_completion(&priv->pm_comp);
>
> /* Tell DSP that suspend is happening */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists