[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSbkH3HkHFxBZ45-@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:57:27 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.cz, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yizhang089@...il.com,
libaokun1@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] ext4: subdivide EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 02:08:00PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
>
> When splitting an extent, if the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT flag is set and
> it is necessary to split the target extent in the middle,
> ext4_split_extent() first handles splitting the latter half of the
> extent and passes the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 flag. This flag implies that
> all blocks before the split point contain valid data; however, this
> assumption is incorrect.
>
> Therefore, subdivid EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 into
> EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1, which
> indicate that the first half of the extent is either entirely valid or
> only partially valid, respectively. These two flags cannot be set
> simultaneously.
>
> This patch does not use EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1, it only replaces
> EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 with EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 at the location
> where it is set, no logical changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Looks good, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 91682966597d..f7aa497e5d6c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,13 @@
> #define EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1 0x2 /* mark first half unwritten */
> #define EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 0x4 /* mark second half unwritten */
>
> -#define EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 0x8 /* first half contains valid data */
> -#define EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 0x10 /* second half contains valid data */
> +/* first half contains valid data */
> +#define EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 0x8 /* has partially valid data */
> +#define EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 0x10 /* has entirely valid data */
> +#define EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 (EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 | \
> + EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1)
> +
> +#define EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 0x20 /* second half contains valid data */
>
> static __le32 ext4_extent_block_csum(struct inode *inode,
> struct ext4_extent_header *eh)
> @@ -3190,8 +3195,9 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
> unsigned int ee_len, depth;
> int err = 0;
>
> - BUG_ON((split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 | EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2)) ==
> - (EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1 | EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2));
> + BUG_ON((split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1) == EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1);
> + BUG_ON((split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1) &&
> + (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2));
>
> ext_debug(inode, "logical block %llu\n", (unsigned long long)split);
>
> @@ -3358,7 +3364,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
> split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1 |
> EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2;
> if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2)
> - split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1;
> + split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1;
> path = ext4_split_extent_at(handle, inode, path,
> map->m_lblk + map->m_len, split_flag1, flags1);
> if (IS_ERR(path))
> @@ -3717,7 +3723,7 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_convert_extents(handle_t *handle,
>
> /* Convert to unwritten */
> if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN) {
> - split_flag |= EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1;
> + split_flag |= EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1;
> /* Convert to initialized */
> } else if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT) {
> split_flag |= ee_block + ee_len <= eof_block ?
> --
> 2.46.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists