[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vDzG3_CKUPRLmFv9Z3qjqcgAp8vhpBHkGs=EA3o3Zxkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:10:38 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: renesas,rzv2h-rspi: Document RZ/V2N SoC support
Hi Geert,
Thank you for the review.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 11:38 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 at 22:45, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > Document the RSPI controller on the Renesas RZ/V2N SoC. The block is
> > compatible with the RSPI implementation found on the RZ/V2H(P) family.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rzv2h-rspi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rzv2h-rspi.yaml
> > @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ maintainers:
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > oneOf:
> > + - items:
> > + - const: renesas,r9a09g056-rspi # RZ/V2N
> > + - const: renesas,r9a09g057-rspi
>
> I am a bit intrigued too read that the initial value of the SPI
> Transfer FIFO Status Register indicates 4 empty stages on RZ/V2H,
> and 16 on RZ/V2N, while both variants have a 16-stage FIFO...
>
Both SoC variants report a value of 0x10 for the RSPIm_SPTFSR register.
Rev.1.20 for RZ/V2N mentions, 16-stage
Rev.1.30 for RZ/V2H mentions, 16-stage
> > - enum:
>
> Please don't bury the enum between two items. Put it at either the
> top or the bottom of the oneOf list.
>
Ok, I will fix that and send v2. The reason to do this was to keep it
sorted based on the SoC part number.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
> > - renesas,r9a09g057-rspi # RZ/V2H(P)
> > - renesas,r9a09g077-rspi # RZ/T2H
>
> For the content added:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists