[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79f1e62d-16e0-47a5-a541-20fd65e37fe4@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:59:37 +0800
From: Shijie Huang <shijie@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: patches@...erecomputing.com, cl@...ux.com,
Shubhang@...amperecomputing.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vschneid@...hat.com, vineethr@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the
delay-dequeue task
On 27/11/2025 13:51, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Can't this be solved by moving update_rq_avg_idle() into
> enqueue_task() in the previous patch? The only path that can
No problem, I can merge this patch into previous patch.
Thanks
Huang Shijie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists