lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANubcdUmUJKeabgagPTWhBd42vzOqx9oxG23FefFJVCcVa_t5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 09:47:30 +0800
From: Stephen Zhang <starzhangzsd@...il.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Cc: Johannes.Thumshirn@....com, hch@...radead.org, gruenba@...hat.com, 
	ming.lei@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, 
	gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangshida@...inos.cn, 
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] block: prevent race condition on bi_status in __bio_chain_endio

Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com> 于2025年11月29日周六 03:44写道:
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 12:34 AM zhangshida <starzhangzsd@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@...inos.cn>
> >
> > Andreas point out that multiple completions can race setting
> > bi_status.
> >
> > The check (parent->bi_status) and the subsequent write are not an
> > atomic operation. The value of parent->bi_status could have changed
> > between the time you read it for the if check and the time you write
> > to it. So we use cmpxchg to fix the race, as suggested by Christoph.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
> > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@...inos.cn>
> > ---
> >  block/bio.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> > index 55c2c1a0020..aa43435c15f 100644
> > --- a/block/bio.c
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -313,9 +313,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_reset);
> >  static struct bio *__bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
> >  {
> >         struct bio *parent = bio->bi_private;
> > +       blk_status_t *status = &parent->bi_status;
>
> nit: this variable seems unnecessary, just use &parent->bi_status
> directly in the one place it's needed?
>

Thanks, Caleb and Andreas. I will integrate your suggestions to:

      if (!bio->bi_status)
               cmpxchg(&parent->bi_status, 0, bio->bi_status);

Thanks,
Shida

> Best,
> Caleb
>
> > +       blk_status_t new_status = bio->bi_status;
> > +
> > +       if (new_status != BLK_STS_OK)
> > +               cmpxchg(status, BLK_STS_OK, new_status);
> >
> > -       if (bio->bi_status && !parent->bi_status)
> > -               parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> >         bio_put(bio);
> >         return parent;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ