[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d9da08d-4293-4dbd-bf59-999488d73763@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 07:40:11 +0800
From: "Li, Tianyou" <tianyou.li@...el.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>, Oscar Salvador
<osalvador@...e.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Wei Yang
<richard.weiyang@...il.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Yong Hu <yong.hu@...el.com>, Nanhai Zou
<nanhai.zou@...el.com>, Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@...el.com>, Tim Chen
<tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, Yu C Chen
<yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Pan Deng <pan.deng@...el.com>, Chen Zhang
<zhangchen.kidd@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/memory hotplug/unplug: Optimize zone->contiguous
update when changes pfn range
Thanks David for the detailed review comments. I will change the code
accordingly after one or two days, in case any other review changes
needed to accommodate. Very appreciated.
On 12/2/2025 2:54 AM, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 12/1/25 14:22, Tianyou Li wrote:
>> When invoke move_pfn_range_to_zone or remove_pfn_range_from_zone, it
>> will
>> update the zone->contiguous by checking the new zone's pfn range from
>> the
>> beginning to the end, regardless the previous state of the old zone.
>> When
>> the zone's pfn range is large, the cost of traversing the pfn range to
>> update the zone->contiguous could be significant.
>>
>> Add fast paths to quickly detect cases where zone is definitely not
>> contiguous without scanning the new zone. The cases are: when the new
>> range
>> did not overlap with previous range, the contiguous should be false;
>> if the
>> new range adjacent with the previous range, just need to check the new
>> range; if the new added pages could not fill the hole of previous
>> zone, the
>> contiguous should be false.
>>
>> The following test cases of memory hotplug for a VM [1], tested in the
>> environment [2], show that this optimization can significantly reduce
>> the
>> memory hotplug time [3].
>>
>> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>>
>> | | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time
>> Reduction |
>> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>> | Plug Memory | 256G | 10s | 2s | 80% |
>> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>> | | 512G | 33s | 6s | 81% |
>> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>>
>>
>> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>>
>> | | Size | Time (before) | Time (after) | Time
>> Reduction |
>> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>> | Unplug Memory | 256G | 10s | 2s | 80% |
>> | +------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>> | | 512G | 34s | 6s | 82% |
>> +----------------+------+---------------+--------------+----------------+
>>
>>
>> [1] Qemu commands to hotplug 256G/512G memory for a VM:
>> object_add memory-backend-ram,id=hotmem0,size=256G/512G,share=on
>> device_add virtio-mem-pci,id=vmem1,memdev=hotmem0,bus=port1
>> qom-set vmem1 requested-size 256G/512G (Plug Memory)
>> qom-set vmem1 requested-size 0G (Unplug Memory)
>>
>> [2] Hardware : Intel Icelake server
>> Guest Kernel : v6.18-rc2
>> Qemu : v9.0.0
>>
>> Launch VM :
>> qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -cpu host \
>> -drive file=./Centos10_cloud.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio \
>> -drive file=./seed.img,format=raw,if=virtio \
>> -smp 3,cores=3,threads=1,sockets=1,maxcpus=3 \
>> -m 2G,slots=10,maxmem=2052472M \
>> -device
>> pcie-root-port,id=port1,bus=pcie.0,slot=1,multifunction=on \
>> -device pcie-root-port,id=port2,bus=pcie.0,slot=2 \
>> -nographic -machine q35 \
>> -nic user,hostfwd=tcp::3000-:22
>>
>> Guest kernel auto-onlines newly added memory blocks:
>> echo online > /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks
>>
>> [3] The time from typing the QEMU commands in [1] to when the output of
>> 'grep MemTotal /proc/meminfo' on Guest reflects that all hotplugged
>> memory is recognized.
>>
>> Reported-by: Nanhai Zou <nanhai.zou@...el.com>
>> Reported-by: Chen Zhang <zhangchen.kidd@...com>
>> Tested-by: Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Yu C Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Pan Deng <pan.deng@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nanhai Zou <nanhai.zou@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@...el.com>
>> ---
>> mm/internal.h | 8 ++++-
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> mm/mm_init.c | 36 +++++++++++++--------
>> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
>> index 1561fc2ff5b8..a94928520a55 100644
>> --- a/mm/internal.h
>> +++ b/mm/internal.h
>> @@ -730,7 +730,13 @@ static inline struct page
>> *pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
>> return __pageblock_pfn_to_page(start_pfn, end_pfn, zone);
>> }
>> -void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone);
>> +enum zone_contiguous_state {
>> + CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT = 0,
>> + CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY = 1,
>> + CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED = 2,
>
> No need for the values.
>
Got it.
>> +};
>
> I don't like that the defines don't match the enum name (zone_c... vs.
> CONT... ).
>
> Essentially you want a "yes / no / maybe" tristate. I don't think we
> have an existing type for that, unfortunately.
>
> enum zone_contig_state {
> ZONE_CONTIG_YES,
> ZONE_CONTIG_NO,
> ZONE_CONTIG_MAYBE,
> };
>
> Maybe someone reading along has a better idea.
>
I agree it's better. Will wait for a day or two to make the change.
>> +
>> +void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone, enum
>> zone_contiguous_state state);
>> bool pfn_range_intersects_zones(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>> unsigned long nr_pages);
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index 0be83039c3b5..b74e558ce822 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -544,6 +544,32 @@ static void update_pgdat_span(struct pglist_data
>> *pgdat)
>> pgdat->node_spanned_pages = node_end_pfn - node_start_pfn;
>> }
>> +static enum zone_contiguous_state __meminit
>> clear_zone_contiguous_for_shrinking(
>> + struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long
>> nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
>> + enum zone_contiguous_state result = CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the removed pfn range inside the original zone span, the
>> contiguous
>> + * property is surely false.
>> + */
>> + if (start_pfn > zone->zone_start_pfn && end_pfn <
>> zone_end_pfn(zone))
>> + result = CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the removed pfn range is at the beginning or end of the
>> + * original zone span, the contiguous property is preserved when
>> + * the original zone is contiguous.
>> + */
>> + else if (start_pfn == zone->zone_start_pfn || end_pfn ==
>> zone_end_pfn(zone))
>> + result = zone->contiguous ?
>> + CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY : CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED;
>> +
>
> See my comment below on how to make this readable.
>
>> + clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + return result;
>> +}
>> +
>> void remove_pfn_range_from_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> unsigned long start_pfn,
>> unsigned long nr_pages)
>> @@ -551,6 +577,7 @@ void remove_pfn_range_from_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
>> struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
>> unsigned long pfn, cur_nr_pages;
>> + enum zone_contiguous_state contiguous_state =
>> CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED;
>> /* Poison struct pages because they are now uninitialized
>> again. */
>> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += cur_nr_pages) {
>> @@ -571,12 +598,13 @@ void remove_pfn_range_from_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> if (zone_is_zone_device(zone))
>> return;
>> - clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + contiguous_state = clear_zone_contiguous_for_shrinking(
>> + zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>
> Reading this again, I wonder whether it would be nicer to have
> something like:
>
> new_contig_state = zone_contig_state_after_shrinking();
> clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>
> or sth like that. Similar for the growing case.
>
In both shrinking and growing case, separate the clear_zone_contiguous
from the logic of zone state check, right?
>> shrink_zone_span(zone, start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages);
>> update_pgdat_span(pgdat);
>> - set_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + set_zone_contiguous(zone, contiguous_state);
>> }
>> /**
>> @@ -736,6 +764,47 @@ static inline void
>> section_taint_zone_device(unsigned long pfn)
>> }
>> #endif
>> +static enum zone_contiguous_state __meminit
>> clear_zone_contiguous_for_growing(
>> + struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long
>> nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
>> + enum zone_contiguous_state result = CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Given the moved pfn range's contiguous property is always true,
>> + * under the conditional of empty zone, the contiguous property
>> should
>> + * be true.
>> + */
>
> I don't think that comment is required.
>
Got it.
>> + if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> + result = CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the moved pfn range does not intersect with the original
>> zone span,
>> + * the contiguous property is surely false.
>> + */
>> + else if (end_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn || start_pfn >
>> zone_end_pfn(zone))
>> + result = CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the moved pfn range is adjacent to the original zone span,
>> given
>> + * the moved pfn range's contiguous property is always true, the
>> zone's
>> + * contiguous property inherited from the original value.
>> + */
>> + else if (end_pfn == zone->zone_start_pfn || start_pfn ==
>> zone_end_pfn(zone))
>> + result = zone->contiguous ?
>> + CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY : CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the original zone's hole larger than the moved pages in
>> the range,
>> + * the contiguous property is surely false.
>> + */
>> + else if (nr_pages < (zone->spanned_pages - zone->present_pages))
>> + result = CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT;
>> +
>
> This is a bit unreadable :)
>
> if (zone_is_empty(zone)) {
> result = CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY;
> } else if (...) {
> /* ... */
> ...
> } else if (...) {
> ...
> }
>
Yes, I am thinking of that during coding. I was keeping that way for a
'better looking'. I agree that will not be a good case for maintaining
the code. Thanks.
>> + clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + return result;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Associate the pfn range with the given zone, initializing the
>> memmaps
>> * and resizing the pgdat/zone data to span the added pages. After
>> this
>> @@ -752,8 +821,8 @@ void move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> unsigned long start_pfn,
>> {
>> struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
>> int nid = pgdat->node_id;
>> -
>> - clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + const enum zone_contiguous_state contiguous_state =
>> + clear_zone_contiguous_for_growing(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>> init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>> @@ -783,7 +852,7 @@ void move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> unsigned long start_pfn,
>> MEMINIT_HOTPLUG, altmap, migratetype,
>> isolate_pageblock);
>> - set_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + set_zone_contiguous(zone, contiguous_state);
>> }
>> struct auto_movable_stats {
>> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
>> index 7712d887b696..06db3fcf7f95 100644
>> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
>> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
>> @@ -2263,26 +2263,34 @@ void __init init_cma_pageblock(struct page
>> *page)
>> }
>> #endif
>> -void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone)
>> +void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone, enum
>> zone_contiguous_state state)
>> {
>> unsigned long block_start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
>> unsigned long block_end_pfn;
>> - block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(block_start_pfn);
>> - for (; block_start_pfn < zone_end_pfn(zone);
>> - block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>> - block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>> + if (state == CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY) {
>> + zone->contiguous = true;
>> + return;
>> + } else if (state == CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT) {
>> + // zone contiguous has already cleared as false, just return.
>> + return;
>> + } else if (state == CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED) {
>> + block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(block_start_pfn);
>> + for (; block_start_pfn < zone_end_pfn(zone);
>> + block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>> + block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>> - block_end_pfn = min(block_end_pfn, zone_end_pfn(zone));
>> + block_end_pfn = min(block_end_pfn, zone_end_pfn(zone));
>> - if (!__pageblock_pfn_to_page(block_start_pfn,
>> - block_end_pfn, zone))
>> - return;
>> - cond_resched();
>> - }
>> + if (!__pageblock_pfn_to_page(block_start_pfn,
>> + block_end_pfn, zone))
>> + return;
>> + cond_resched();
>> + }
>> - /* We confirm that there is no hole */
>> - zone->contiguous = true;
>> + /* We confirm that there is no hole */
>> + zone->contiguous = true;
>> + }
>> }
>
>
> switch (state) {
> case CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY:
> zone->contiguous = true;
> return;
> case CONTIGUOUS_DEFINITELY_NOT:
> return;
> default:
> break;
> }
>
> ... unchanged logic.
>
Will do. Thanks.
>> /*
>> @@ -2348,7 +2356,7 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
>> shuffle_free_memory(NODE_DATA(nid));
>> for_each_populated_zone(zone)
>> - set_zone_contiguous(zone);
>> + set_zone_contiguous(zone, CONTIGUOUS_UNDETERMINED);
>> /* Initialize page ext after all struct pages are
>> initialized. */
>> if (deferred_struct_pages)
>
>
Regards,
Tianyou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists