linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/ttm: Use dma_fence_check_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251201105011.19386-8-phasta@kernel.org>
Date: Mon,  1 Dec 2025 11:50:10 +0100
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
	Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/ttm: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal()

The return code of dma_fence_signal() is not useful and shall be removed
from the kernel. To do so, the few users who rely on the return code
must be ported.

Use dma_fence_check_and_signal() and mapp its boolean return code to
dma_fence_signal()'s former value for already-signaled fences.

Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
index 1bcc67977f48..eaf2e91f8e97 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int threaded_fence_signal(void *arg)
 
 	msleep(20);
 
-	return dma_fence_signal(fence);
+	return dma_fence_check_and_signal(fence) ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
 static void ttm_bo_validate_move_fence_not_signaled(struct kunit *test)
-- 
2.49.0