[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251201105011.19386-10-phasta@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:50:12 +0100
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_test_signaled_flag()
There is a new dma_fence helper which simplifies testing for a fence's
signaled_flag. Use it in xe.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 9 +++------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 3 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
index cb5f204c08ed..06736f52fbaa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
@@ -1037,8 +1037,7 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_exec_queue_last_fence_get(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
xe_exec_queue_last_fence_lockdep_assert(q, vm);
- if (q->last_fence &&
- test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &q->last_fence->flags))
+ if (q->last_fence && dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(q->last_fence))
xe_exec_queue_last_fence_put(q, vm);
fence = q->last_fence ? q->last_fence : dma_fence_get_stub();
@@ -1064,8 +1063,7 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_exec_queue_last_fence_get_for_resume(struct xe_exec_queue *
lockdep_assert_held_write(&q->hwe->hw_engine_group->mode_sem);
- if (q->last_fence &&
- test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &q->last_fence->flags))
+ if (q->last_fence && dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(q->last_fence))
xe_exec_queue_last_fence_put_unlocked(q);
fence = q->last_fence ? q->last_fence : dma_fence_get_stub();
@@ -1106,8 +1104,7 @@ int xe_exec_queue_last_fence_test_dep(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_vm *vm)
fence = xe_exec_queue_last_fence_get(q, vm);
if (fence) {
- err = test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags) ?
- 0 : -ETIME;
+ err = dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(fence) ? 0 : -ETIME;
dma_fence_put(fence);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
index 07f96bda638a..1ca2dec18e51 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
@@ -1208,8 +1208,7 @@ static bool no_in_syncs(struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs)
for (i = 0; i < num_syncs; i++) {
struct dma_fence *fence = syncs[i].fence;
- if (fence && !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
- &fence->flags))
+ if (fence && !dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(fence))
return false;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c
index d21bf8f26964..1c9ba49a325b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static bool xe_fence_set_error(struct dma_fence *fence, int error)
bool signaled;
spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, irq_flags);
- signaled = test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags);
+ signaled = dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(fence);
if (!signaled)
dma_fence_set_error(fence, error);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, irq_flags);
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists