linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: soc: altera: combine Intel's SoCFPGA into altera.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35735aa9-26ce-4922-bd05-f68cc75353fb@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 06:26:25 -0600
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: soc: altera: combine Intel's
 SoCFPGA into altera.yaml



On 11/26/25 03:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 07:40:03AM -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> For all SoCFPGA platforms, whether it has the "intel" or "altr" vendor
>> prefix are referring to the same business unit that is responsible for
>> the platform. Thus, it would make sense to have the device bindings
>> documentation in the same location. Move the Intel AgileX board binding
>> documentations into the same file that contains the Altera ones.
> 
> I had impression that "intel" is the new, thus preferred vendor prefix
> and actual owner, so please describe here why this is the other way.
> 

Altera has just spun off to be a separate business entity from Intel. 
Yes, while Intel is still a minority owner, Altera is technically on 
it's own. Moving forward, "altr" would be the preferred vendor prefix 
for SoCFPGA parts.

Dinh