[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTBecRhz5qN8O1UX@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:59:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] objtool: Improve code generation for annotation
macros
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 10:06:56PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > For tip/objtool/core.
> >
> > As much as possible, undo the code generation damage introduced by
> > ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL:
> >
> > - Remove its usage in favor of SHF_MERGE + sh_entsize, where possible
> >
> > - Print the annotation on a single line:
> >
> > 912: .pushsection ".discard.annotate_data", "M", @progbits, 8; .long 912b - .; .long 1; .popsection
> >
> > - Remove the trailing newline/tab; let the invoking code decide on the
> > appropriate separator for the given context
> >
> > Josh Poimboeuf (4):
> > x86/alternative: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage
> > x86/asm: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage
> > objtool: Consolidate annotation macros
> > objtool: Remove newlines and tabs from annotation macros
>
> Durr, this will conflict with tip/core/bugs. Let me ponder this a bit.
So Josh has resolved these conflicts based on latest -git
which has all these moving pieces integrated into a single
tree, so I've applied these fixes to tip:objtool/urgent.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists