[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d695ad6a-ea75-4922-b544-174f3a547f8a@aosc.io>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:04:59 +0800
From: WangYuli <wangyuli@...c.io>
To: chenhuacai@...nel.org, kernel@...0n.name
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org,
bjorn@...osinc.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn,
apopple@...dia.com, thuth@...hat.com, linmag7@...il.com,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
WangYuli <wangyl5933@...naunicom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Use __pmd() helper for __swp_entry_to_pmd()
Hi Huacai,
On 2025/12/3 17:46, Huacai Chen wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 03fb60432fde..4e09f7e8bbec 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static inline pte_t mk_swap_pte(unsigned long type, unsigned long offset)
>> #define __pte_to_swp_entry(pte) ((swp_entry_t) { pte_val(pte) })
>> #define __swp_entry_to_pte(x) ((pte_t) { (x).val })
> Why not change __swp_entry_to_pte() together with __pte()?
>
> Huacai
I haven't investigated this closely, but it's odd that changing just
this one spot was enough to get it to compile — there doesn't seem to be
an error at __swp_entry_to_pte.
But you're right that changing both together looks neater.
If you think it's necessary, I'm happy to submit a patch v2.
Thanks,
--
WangYuli
Powered by blists - more mailing lists