[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16038b9d-11f4-4995-b0c2-7e7d55bb494a@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:50:12 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Frank Wunderlich <frankwu@....de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Chen Minqiang <ptpt52@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"Chester A. Unal" <chester.a.unal@...nc9.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: Use GPIO polarity to generate
correct reset sequence
> Frank said that the fact the driver expecting a wrong device tree is
> forcing him to keep introducing even more wrong device trees for new
> boards.
So it sounds like there is no technical reason to fix this, it is just
aesthetics?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists