linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Replace magic numbers with named constants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOPX745UGiAJhWnj7T84dBqjB2-bcK+qG5iytiHhQxu6Pb8e6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:40:00 +0300
From: Artem Shimko <a.shimko.dev@...il.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, jsd@...ihalf.com, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Replace magic numbers with named constants

On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 3:12 PM Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:07:55PM +0300, Artem Shimko wrote:
> > Hi Mika,
> >
> > Sorry about that, I'm a newbie and might make mistakes.
> >
> > Yes, I'm confused about the versions myself, and yes, there is a v3.
> >
> > Am I right? Even though I already sent it in response to the kernel
> > robot report, would it be better to forward v3 to a separate thread?
>
> Just send the next version (whatever it is, v4?) as a separate thread with
> proper explanations what was changed under the '---' line.
Hi Mika,

Thank you.

There's no v4. This was an attempt to resend v3, but I sent it
incorrectly and with a version error.

Let me post it as a separate thread to fix this mess.

Regards,
Artem