linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Replace magic numbers with named constants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251204121240.GD1613537@black.igk.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:12:40 +0100
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Artem Shimko <a.shimko.dev@...il.com>
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
	jsd@...ihalf.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Replace magic numbers with named
 constants

On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:07:55PM +0300, Artem Shimko wrote:
> Hi Mika,
> 
> Sorry about that, I'm a newbie and might make mistakes.
> 
> Yes, I'm confused about the versions myself, and yes, there is a v3.
> 
> Am I right? Even though I already sent it in response to the kernel
> robot report, would it be better to forward v3 to a separate thread?

Just send the next version (whatever it is, v4?) as a separate thread with
proper explanations what was changed under the '---' line.