[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTLDJPD-4TLEuRI9@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 20:33:56 +0900
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i2c-host for v6.18
Hi Andi,
> here is the pull request for this cycle. I was hoping it would be
> more substantial, but I ran into a nasty issue with my gpg setup
> that blocked me from pushing to kernel.org for several weeks. The
> kernel.org helpdesk helped me sort it out, but unfortunately a
> bit too late, so this is all I managed to gather in time.
Things happen. Don't worry about this one...
> I am sorry for the disruption. I will set up a backup solution so
> that I can avoid this problem in the future.
Another tree at gitlab maybe?
> The following changes since commit 7d0a66e4bb9081d75c82ec4957c50034cb0ea449:
>
> Linux 6.18 (2025-11-30 14:42:10 -0800)
Urgs, but this is highly problematic. I can't pull something based on
6.18. Usually, things are based on -rc1 or something early to show Linus
that it has been in -next for a while. He won't pull something that is
less than 48 hours in public and so won't I.
I hope you still have the ref of the branch *before* you rebased to
6.18. Please send a pull request for this old one.
And I am quite sure I said it before: Please *do* *not* rebase branches
you have published which are meant to be consumed! Other people (me!)
depend on their stability and history. In very rare cases, sometimes a
commit needs to be modified or deleted. But the base should really stay
the base. If you need a newer one (also rare), merge it.
Not pulled, sorry.
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists