[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <luhtzwbic5a6a4tl5coa2zv3jxoo5f6sab7gv4gcxpubv3ioye@h7xlfx2bxcgr>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 04:43:35 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Anusha Ajithkumar <tessolveupstream@...il.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: talos-evk: Add support for
QCS615 talos evk board
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 10:58:56AM +0530, Anusha Ajithkumar wrote:
>
>
> On 03-12-2025 02:36, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 12:16, <tessolveupstream@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14-11-2025 01:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:27:35PM +0530, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:
> >
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&uart0 {
> >>>> + status = "okay";
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&usb_1_hsphy {
> >>>> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l5a>;
> >>>> + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
> >>>> + vdda-phy-dpdm-supply = <&vreg_l13a>;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + status = "okay";
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&usb_qmpphy {
> >>>> + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l5a>;
> >>>> + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + status = "okay";
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&usb_1 {
> >>>> + status = "okay";
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&usb_1_dwc3 {
> >>>> + dr_mode = "host";
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +&usb_hsphy_2 {
> >>>
> >>> So, the labels are usb_1_hsphy, but usb_hsphy_2? That's not logical,
> >>> please fix one of them. Then please fix the order of nodes here.
> >>
> >> The node names come directly from the included talos.dtsi, where they
> >> are defined as usb_1_hsphy & usb_hsphy_2.
> >> To avoid breaking inherited definitions, we kept the same labels
> >> in our board DTS.
> >
> > Please fix them in the base DT.
> >
>
> The inconsistent naming originates from talos.dtsi, which is
> outside the scope of this patch series. Modifying these labels
> in our board DTS would break the inherited node references
> from talos.dtsi. >> However, I will reorder the nodes so they appear in a logical and
Please fix the base DT. There is no such thing as "out of scope".
> >> consistent sequence.
> >
> > This is a prerequisite, no questions.
> >
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists