linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: google: Add Google Tensor G5 USB PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+zupgy5TKWiVGwt5dFye7ztk7O_n7JQm4j7H8BCC2gzjfkgqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 18:44:31 -0800
From: Roy Luo <royluo@...gle.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>, 
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>, Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	Joy Chakraborty <joychakr@...gle.com>, Naveen Kumar <mnkumar@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: google: Add Google Tensor G5 USB PHY

On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 12:18 PM Roy Luo <royluo@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 11:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I assume you understood what should be done instead in this patchset.
> > Anyway, my previous tag applies if there were no bindings changes, but I
> > wasted too much time here to care anymore. The expectation from big
> > companies is they do not ask community to coach on basic submission
> > process. It's quite unfair to my spare, personal time after work,
> > considering how much big company is making. Big company should invest in
> > this coaching.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
>
> Thank you for the feedback. I understand your frustration, and I
> apologize for taking up your time. I will be sure to be more thorough
> in the future.
>
> Thanks,
> Roy Luo

To confirm my takeaway: for this patch, the changes I introduced
were not significant enough to remove your 'Reviewed-by' tag,
and I should have kept it. Moving forward, I will calibrate my
criteria for what changes are considered 'significant' (essentially
any changes to binding), and more importantly, always document
the rationale for dropping or keeping tags in the changelog when
I make non-trivial changes to patches.

I plan to send a new version for this patchset and the controller
patchset [1] next week with your tag re-added, please let me
know if you disagree.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20251205-controller-v9-0-9f158b18f979@google.com

Thanks,
Roy Luo