[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251206035403.GR1712166@ZenIV>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 03:54:03 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fuse update for 6.19
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 07:29:13PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 at 18:28, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, ->d_prune() would take it out of the rbtree, but what if it hits
>
> Ahh.
>
> Maybe increase the d_count before releasing that rbtree lock?
>
> Or yeah, maybe moving it to d_release. Miklos?
Moving it to ->d_release() would be my preference, TBH. Then
we could simply dget() the sucker under the lock and follow
that with existing dput_to_list() after dropping the lock...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists