[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251206194637.GH1219718@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 15:46:37 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skolothumtho@...dia.com,
praan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v1 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE EATS when
computing the update sequence
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 04:52:02PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
>
> If a VM want to toggle EATS off the hypervisor will see EATS change to 0
> and insert a V=0 breaking update into the STE even though the VM did not
> ask for that.
"EATS off at the same time as changing CFG"
In bare metal EATS is ignored by CFG=ABORT/BYPASS which is why this
doesn't cause a problem until we have nested where CFG is always a
variation of S2 trans that does use EATS.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists