[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251206205813.08542093@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 20:58:13 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@...sala.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno
Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Andy
Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad9467: add support for ad9211
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:16:41 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 02:14:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 08:01:04AM +0000, Tomas Melin wrote:
> > > The AD9211 is a 10-bit monolithic sampling analog-to-digital
> > > converter optimized for high performance, low power, and ease
>
> Also just noticed that this paragraph is visible shorter than the last one,
> can you make them approximately the same line length?
>
> > > of use. The product operates at up to a 300 MSPS conversion
>
> Is it megasamples? Then MSps?
>
> > > rate and is optimized for outstanding dynamic performance
> > > in wideband carrier and broadband systems.
>
> > > The scale table implemented here is not an exact match with the
> > > datasheet as the table presented there is missing some information.
> > > The reference presents these values as being linear,
> > > but that does not add up. There is information missing in the table.
> > > Implemented scale table matches values at the middle and at the ends,
> > > smoothing the curve towards middle and end.
> > > Impact on end result from deviation in scale factor affects only software
> > > using it for scaling. All the possible hw-settings are also available with
> > > this implementation.
> >
> >
> > Some amendment in the headers would be nice to have,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
>
> ...
>
> > + array_size.h
> >
> > > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > +#include <linux/units.h>
> > >
> >
> > You can drop one blank line here.
>
I have nothing to add from a quick read. I thought about fixing up Andy's
comments and applying but meh, it's early in the cycle and beer o'clock,
so please do a v3 tidying those up.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists