linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: adc: ad9467: add support for ad9211

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251206-tangerine-wildebeest-of-weather-8f9211@quoll>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 12:03:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@...sala.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: adc: ad9467: add support for ad9211

On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 08:01:03AM +0000, Tomas Melin wrote:
> Document ad9211 variant as supported by driver. This has e.g.

Drop "as supported by driver", not relevant here. Just say that device
is not compatible with existing because of different scaling ....

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review
tags are being ignored. If you know the process, just skip it entirely
(please do not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions
intended, no patronizing, I just want to avoid wasted efforts). If you
do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...').
However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L591
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof