[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTjnH_i0q0xyLysD@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:21:03 +0900
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Cc: Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
Houlong Wei <houlong.wei@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] media: mediatek: amend vpu_get_plat_device()
documentation
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 03:43:30PM -0500, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le mardi 28 octobre 2025 à 11:04 +0100, Johan Hovold a écrit :
> > Add a comment to the vpu_get_plat_device() documentation to make it
> > clear that the VPU platform device is returned with an incremented
> > reference count (which needs to be dropped after use).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vpu/mtk_vpu.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vpu/mtk_vpu.h b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vpu/mtk_vpu.h
> > index da05f3e74081..5808311d2b15 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vpu/mtk_vpu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vpu/mtk_vpu.h
> > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ int vpu_ipi_send(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > * device for using VPU API.
> > *
> > * Return: Return NULL if it is failed.
> > - * otherwise it is VPU's platform device
> > + * otherwise it is VPU's platform device with incremented reference count
>
> I picked this patch but rewrote with what felt like better and dense.
>
> - * Return: Return NULL if it is failed.
> - * otherwise it is VPU's platform device
> + * Return: a reference to the VPU's platform device, or NULL on failure.
>
> hope its ok with you,
Sure, my only concern is that just saying "reference" is too subtle,
that's why I explicitly mentioned the refcount.
Btw, why is patch 2/2 marked obsolete? That leak is still there both on
probe errors (which I saw someone else posted a fix for) and on driver
unbind.
Johan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists