[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <991fd4a9-62f0-46e5-b638-30d10353bf5f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:47:15 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fate of CONFIG_IRQ_TIMINGS and co
On 12/10/25 02:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08 2025 at 05:49, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> If this is a work in progress and that there is a line of sight to
>>> having it working upstream, that's great, and I will happily post the
>>> few fixes I have for it. Otherwise, can we do ourselves a favour and
>>> consider dropping it?
>>
>> Yes, we already discuss that a few cycles ago with Thomas and, as there
>> is no progress, it makes sense to remove it.
>
> Who is going to send the patch?
I can send the patches but not before a couple of weeks.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists