linux-kernel - Re: Fate of CONFIG_IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <861pl2pwv4.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:25:03 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fate of CONFIG_IRQ_TIMINGS and co

On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 01:13:03 +0000,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Dec 08 2025 at 05:49, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> If this is a work in progress and that there is a line of sight to
> >> having it working upstream, that's great, and I will happily post the
> >> few fixes I have for it. Otherwise, can we do ourselves a favour and
> >> consider dropping it?
> >
> > Yes, we already discuss that a few cycles ago with Thomas and, as there 
> > is no progress, it makes sense to remove it.
> 
> Who is going to send the patch?

Series at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251210082242.360936-1-maz@kernel.org

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.