linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: freescale: imx95: Add support for i.MX95 15x15 FRDM board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251210075927.GA13526@francesco-nb>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:59:27 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Lei Xu <lei.xu@....com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, justin.jiang@....com,
	qijian.guo@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: freescale: imx95: Add support for i.MX95
 15x15 FRDM board

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:05:44PM -0800, Lei Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 07:57:07AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 07, 2025 at 05:26:06AM -0800, Lei Xu wrote:
> > > The i.MX95 15x15 FRDM board is a compact and cost-effective development
> > > platform based on the i.MX95 applications processor.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-frdm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-frdm.dts
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..61e815c858b8
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-frdm.dts
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > +
> > > +/* Default settings in i.mx95.dtsi are for i.MX95 19x19 package.
> > > + * Override here for the i.MX95 15x15 package.
> > > + */
> > > +&netc_bus0 {
> > > +	msi-map = <0x0 &its 0x60 0x1>,	//ENETC0 PF
> > > +		  <0x10 &its 0x61 0x1>, //ENETC0 VF0
> > > +		  <0x20 &its 0x62 0x1>, //ENETC0 VF1
> > > +		  <0x40 &its 0x63 0x1>, //ENETC1 PF
> > > +		  <0x50 &its 0x65 0x1>, //ENETC1 VF0
> > > +		  <0x60 &its 0x66 0x1>, //ENETC1 VF1
> > > +		  <0x80 &its 0x64 0x1>, //ENETC2 PF
> > > +		  <0xc0 &its 0x67 0x1>; //NETC Timer
> > > +	iommu-map = <0x0 &smmu 0x20 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0x10 &smmu 0x21 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0x20 &smmu 0x22 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0x40 &smmu 0x23 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0x50 &smmu 0x25 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0x60 &smmu 0x26 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0x80 &smmu 0x24 0x1>,
> > > +		    <0xc0 &smmu 0x27 0x1>;
> > > +};
> > 
> > If the 19x19 and 15x15 i.MX95 requires something different you should
> > have a different soc dtsi. Probably creating a new imx95-$something
> > dtsi, that includes the existing imx95.dtsi and override this property.
> > 
> > This solution does not scale, please fix it.
> > 
> > Francesco
> >
> 
> Hello, Francesco
> 
> The original comment is misleading because this configuration applies
> to the board rather than the SoC.

If this is a board configuration, why it is in imx95.dtsi in the first
place?

In addition, I am interested in the topic, can you explain in more
detail why this is needed and what is this achieving?

Francesco