linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fjes: Add missing iounmap in fjes_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025121108-armless-earthling-7a6f@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:49:16 +0900
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Haoxiang Li <lihaoxiang@...c.iscas.ac.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fjes: Add missing iounmap in fjes_hw_init()

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:10:37AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > In error paths, add fjes_hw_iounmap() to release the
> > resource acquired by fjes_hw_iomap(). Add a goto label
> > to do so.
> 
> Under which circumstances would you get into the mood to take more desirable
> word wrap preferences better into account?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18#n658

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot