[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTrH1H4otA-cQyXa@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:32:04 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: Fix acronym for Intel Gemini Lake
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 09:45:54AM +0100, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2025-12-10 12:55 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > While the used GML is consistent with the pattern for other Intel * Lake
> > SoCs, the de facto use is GLK. Update the acronym and users accordingly.
> >
> > Note, a handful of the drivers for Gemini Lake in the Linux kernel use
> > GLK already (LPC, MEI, pin control, SDHCI, ...) and even some in ASoC.
> > The only ones in this patch used the inconsistent one.
>
> A number of times I've fought for the 'GLK' to disappear from the Intel's
> audio subsystem as clearly the "right" shortcut is 'GML'.
Probably you were late as that boat sailed and we have the only your
driver (and SOF which was put into position to reuse the existing ID)
use the correct acronym.
> However, I do understand where are you coming from - the corrections came
> late and the "mistake" has been widely spread.
Yeah... With all understanding and support for the correctness, the easiest
way to get rid of inconsistency is to change only these couple of drivers
and not the entire world.
...
> > -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HDA_GML 0x3198
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HDA_GLK 0x3198
>
> If two #defines are no-go (PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HDA_GLK and _GML), then
> perhaps at least a comment to the right of the ID mentioning the "GML" would
> help.
Bjorn, are you agree on adding a comment to PCI IDs to point out that in a
couple of Intel documents the machine's acronym is GML?
...
> > --- a/sound/soc/intel/avs/board_selection.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/avs/board_selection.c
> > - AVS_MACH_ENTRY(HDA_GML, avs_gml_i2s_machines),
> > + AVS_MACH_ENTRY(HDA_GLK, avs_glk_i2s_machines),
>
> To be honest, I'd leave 'avs_gml_i2s_machines' as is.
Sure, your driver your rules :), I will not touch that in v2.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists