linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87345h6qz0.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:19:31 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,  Vignesh Raghavendra
 <vigneshr@...com>,  Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,  Tudor Ambarus
 <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,  Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,  Thomas
 Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,  Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>,
  Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,  linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation

On 11/12/2025 at 11:06:11 +09, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
>> The choice of defining two variables named primary and secondary instead
>> of using an array of templates is on purpose, to simplify the reading. I
>> find less obvious the use of an array here but this is personal taste.
>
> This makes sense to me:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>
> Feel free to carry both these patches along with the rest of the
> series, if/when you do end up applying it a signed tag would probably be
> a good idea in case there's some collision with other SPI work.

Thanks a lot for the feedback.

Yes, when the series is considered ready, I'll take care of that tag.

Thanks,
Miquèl