linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aTonE4REBDfaWBQo@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:06:11 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>, Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation

On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:

> The choice of defining two variables named primary and secondary instead
> of using an array of templates is on purpose, to simplify the reading. I
> find less obvious the use of an array here but this is personal taste.

This makes sense to me:

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Feel free to carry both these patches along with the rest of the
series, if/when you do end up applying it a signed tag would probably be
a good idea in case there's some collision with other SPI work.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)