[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aT05K3lPjhYE4iug@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 11:00:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:43:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yazen Ghannam (1):
> > x86/acpi/boot: Correct acpi_is_processor_usable() check again
>
> This one was supposed to stay for a whole cycle in tip - *even* *if* it is
> stable material.
Yeah, but that's not really how we apply -stable tags. If it's good for
-stable, it's good for Linus's tree, full stop.
The last I saw from this patch was that you wrote this a month ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114165358.GCaRdepiZOYK9DlcSc@fat_crate.local
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
| Thanks a lot! It looks good in my testing too, so far.
|
| I'll queue it soon.
And it's been in -next ever since.
Anyway, Linus, if you haven't pulled this yet then please belay
this pull request, I'll move this patch back into tip:x86/boot
and remove the misapplied -stable tag.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists