[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251213100136.3d83a236@pumpkin>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:01:36 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>, Richard Genoud
<richard.genoud@...tlin.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, Peter
Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Mika
Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, Andreas Noever
<andreas.noever@...il.com>, Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] thunderbolt: Don't pass a bitfield to
FIELD_GET
On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 21:28:31 -0500
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 07:37:07PM +0000, david.laight.linux@...il.com wrote:
> > From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
> >
> > None of sizeof(), typeof() or __auto_type can be used with bitfields
> > which makes it difficult to assign a #define parameter to a local
> > without promoting char and short to int.
> >
> > Change:
> > u32 thunderbolt_version:8;
> > to the equivalent:
> > u8 thunderbolt_version;
> > (and the other three bytes of 'DWORD 4' to match).
> >
> > This is necessary so that FIELD_GET can use sizeof() to verify 'reg'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes for v2:
> > - Change structure definition instead of call to FIELD_GET().
> >
> > FIELD_GET currently uses _Generic() which behaves differently for
> > gcc and clang (I suspect both are wrong!).
> > gcc treats 'u32 foo:8' as 'u8', but will take the 'default' for other
> > widths (which will generate an error in FIED_GET().
> > clang treats 'u32 foo:n' as 'u32'.
>
> FIELD_GET() works just well with bitfields, and whatever you do breaks
> it. I pointed that in v1, but instead of fixing it, you do really well
> hiding the problem.
It doesn't, pass 'u32 foo:6' when using gcc.
David
>
> I see no reasons to hack a random victim because of your rework. So
> NAK for this.
>
> In v3, please add an explicit test to make sure that bitfields are not
> broken with new implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> Yury
Powered by blists - more mailing lists