[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AzuZVkD3rTLEDGFpCx0ovtKfzjZtNgGG0uLDXbPkiqRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 09:04:38 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Stefano Radaelli <stefano.radaelli21@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Radaelli <stefano.r@...iscite.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] arm64: dts: imx8mp-var-som: Add support for
ADS7846 touchscreen
Hi Stefano,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 8:05 AM Stefano Radaelli
<stefano.radaelli21@...il.com> wrote:
> + /* Resistive touch controller */
> + ads7846: touchscreen@0 {
> + compatible = "ti,ads7846";
The public datasheet states that the touchscreen is a TSC2046:
https://variscite.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/VAR-SOM-MX8M-PLUS_V2_Datasheet.pdf
I understand they are both from the same family of touchscreen
controllers, but shouldn't you use the ti,tsc2046 compatible string
instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists