lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHP4M8Uy7HLiKjnMCdNG+QG+0cizN82c_G87AuzDL6qDCBG5vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 17:38:50 +0530
From: Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@...il.com>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: A lingering doubt on PCI-MMIO region of PCI-passthrough-device

Hi everyone.

Let's assume x86_64-linux host and guest, with full-virtualization and
iommu hardware capabilities.

Before launching vm, qemu with the help vfio "installs" "dev1" on the
virtual-pci-root-complex of guest.
After bootup, the guest does the usual enumeration, finds "dev1" on
the pci-bus, and programs the BARs in its domain.

However, there is no guarantee that guest-pci-mmio-physical-ranges
would be identical to "what would have been"
host-pci-mmio-physical-ranges.
Then how does the EPT/SLAT tables get set up for correct mapping from
GPA => HPA for dev1's-BARs-MMIO-regions ?

Will be grateful for pointers.

Thanks and Regards,
Ajay

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ