[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d93c8ac-4d56-4a4a-94d6-08dbfd9d4a9f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 14:33:12 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...nlining.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@....qualcomm.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
linux@...nlining.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630/660: Add CDSP-related
nodes
On 12/11/25 3:30 PM, Nickolay Goppen wrote:
>
> 11.12.2025 15:24, Nickolay Goppen пишет:
>>
>> 23.10.2025 22:51, Nickolay Goppen пишет:
>>> In order to enable CDSP support for SDM660 SoC:
>>> * add shared memory p2p nodes for CDSP
>>> * add CDSP-specific smmu node
>>> * add CDSP peripheral image loader node
>>>
>>> Memory region for CDSP in SDM660 occupies the same spot as
>>> TZ buffer mem defined in sdm630.dtsi (which does not have CDSP).
>>> In sdm660.dtsi replace buffer_mem inherited from SDM630 with
>>> cdsp_region, which is also larger in size.
>>>
>>> SDM636 also doesn't have CDSP, so remove inherited from sdm660.dtsi
>>> related nodes and add buffer_mem back.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...nlining.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi | 23 +++--
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
>>> index 8b1a45a4e56e..a6a1933229b9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
>>> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ modem_smp2p_in: slave-kernel {
>>> };
>>> };
>>> - soc@0 {
>>> + soc: soc@0 {
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>> ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi
>>> index ae15d81fa3f9..38e6e3bfc3ce 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi
>>> @@ -7,15 +7,20 @@
>>> #include "sdm660.dtsi"
>>> -/*
>>> - * According to the downstream DTS,
>>> - * 636 is basically a 660 except for
>>> - * different CPU frequencies, Adreno
>>> - * 509 instead of 512 and lack of
>>> - * turing IP. These differences will
>>> - * be addressed when the aforementioned
>>> - * peripherals will be enabled upstream.
>>> - */
>>> +/delete-node/ &remoteproc_cdsp;
>>> +/delete-node/ &cdsp_smmu;
>>> +/delete-node/ &cdsp_region;
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> + /delete-node/ smp2p-cdsp;
>>> +
>>> + reserved-memory {
>>> + buffer_mem: tzbuffer@...00000 {
>>> + reg = <0x0 0x94a00000 0x00 0x100000>;
>>> + no-map;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> &adreno_gpu {
>>> compatible = "qcom,adreno-509.0", "qcom,adreno";
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
>>> index ef4a563c0feb..d50cce25ccbe 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm660.dtsi
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,37 @@
>>> #include "sdm630.dtsi"
>>> +/delete-node/ &buffer_mem;
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> + smp2p-cdsp {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,smp2p";
>>> + qcom,smem = <94>, <432>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 514 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>>> + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 30>;
>>> + qcom,local-pid = <0>;
>>> + qcom,remote-pid = <5>;
>>> +
>>> + cdsp_smp2p_out: master-kernel {
>>> + qcom,entry-name = "master-kernel";
>>> + #qcom,smem-state-cells = <1>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + cdsp_smp2p_in: slave-kernel {
>>> + qcom,entry-name = "slave-kernel";
>>> + interrupt-controller;
>>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + reserved-memory {
>>> + cdsp_region: cdsp@...00000 {
>>> + reg = <0x0 0x94a00000 0x00 0x600000>;
>>> + no-map;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> &adreno_gpu {
>>> compatible = "qcom,adreno-512.0", "qcom,adreno";
>>> operating-points-v2 = <&gpu_sdm660_opp_table>;
>>> @@ -247,6 +278,137 @@ &mmcc {
>>> <0>;
>>> };
>>> +&soc {
>>> + cdsp_smmu: iommu@...0000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2";
>>> + reg = <0x5180000 0x40000>;
>>> + #iommu-cells = <1>;
>>> +
>>> + #global-interrupts = <2>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 229 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 231 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 533 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 534 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 535 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 536 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 537 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 538 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 539 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 540 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 541 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 542 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 543 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 544 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 545 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 546 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 547 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 548 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 549 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> +
>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_HLOS1_VOTE_TURING_ADSP_SMMU_CLK>;
>>> + clock-names = "bus";
>>> +
>>> + power-domains = <&gcc HLOS1_VOTE_TURING_ADSP_GDSC>;
>>> +
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + remoteproc_cdsp: remoteproc@...00000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm660-cdsp-pas";
>>> + reg = <0x1a300000 0x00100>;
>>> + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 518 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>> + <&cdsp_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>> + <&cdsp_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>> + <&cdsp_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>> + <&cdsp_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "wdog",
>>> + "fatal",
>>> + "ready",
>>> + "handover",
>>> + "stop-ack";
>>> +
>>> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
>>> + clock-names = "xo";
>>> +
>>> + memory-region = <&cdsp_region>;
>>> + power-domains = <&rpmpd SDM660_VDDCX>;
>>> + power-domain-names = "cx";
>>> +
>>> + qcom,smem-states = <&cdsp_smp2p_out 0>;
>>> + qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
>>> +
>>> + glink-edge {
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 513 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>>> +
>>> + label = "turing";
>>> + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 29>;
>>> + qcom,remote-pid = <5>;
>>> +
>>> + fastrpc {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc";
>>> + qcom,glink-channels = "fastrpcglink-apps-dsp";
>>> + label = "cdsp";
>>> + qcom,non-secure-domain;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@5 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <5>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 3>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@6 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <6>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 4>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@7 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <7>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 5>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@8 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <8>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 6>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@9 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <9>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 7>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@10 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <10>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 8>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@11 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <11>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 9>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@12 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <12>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 10>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + compute-cb@13 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc-compute-cb";
>>> + reg = <13>;
>>> + iommus = <&cdsp_smmu 11>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> &tlmm {
>>> compatible = "qcom,sdm660-pinctrl";
>>> };
>>>
>> I've found out that all (both ADSP's and CDSP's) fastrpc-compute-cb's in downstream are defined under the one node [1], and all of them are handled by one adsprpc driver. There's a node [2], where a memory-region is assigned to this driver.
>>
>> Does this mean that both DSP's are using this one region for FastRPC?
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/pix106/android_kernel_xiaomi_southwest-4.19/blob/main/arch/arm64/boot/dts/vendor/qcom/sdm660.dtsi#L1349
>>
>> [2] https://github.com/pix106/android_kernel_xiaomi_southwest-4.19/blob/main/arch/arm64/boot/dts/vendor/qcom/sdm660.dtsi#L1342
>>
> I've also noticed that both DSP's are connected to the mas_crypto_c0 bus [1].
>
> Is this bus neccessary for DSP's to use the FastRPC?
No, that's covered by the SCM device
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists