[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aca5ed6d-8d39-4968-aef2-d5ab6c8cfb60@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:43:18 +0530
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sachinpb@...ux.ibm.com,
venkat88@...ux.ibm.com, andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, naveen@...nel.org,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] powerpc64/bpf: Inline helper in powerpc
JIT
On 16/12/25 11:46 pm, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:51 PM Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> This series add support for internal only per-CPU instructions,
>> inlines the bpf_get_smp_processor_id() and bpf_get_current_task()
>> helper calls for powerpc BPF JIT.
>>
>
> This is marked for bpf-next tree, but I think this should actually go
> through ppc64-specific tree, is that right?
Yeah.
Maddy, can you pick it via powerpc tree?
- Hari
Powered by blists - more mailing lists