[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6419f23b-01bb-4ccd-89a9-2a606bc984eb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 08:41:16 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sachinpb@...ux.ibm.com,
venkat88@...ux.ibm.com, andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, naveen@...nel.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] powerpc64/bpf: Inline helper in powerpc
JIT
On 12/17/25 10:43 AM, Hari Bathini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/12/25 11:46 pm, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:51 PM Saket Kumar Bhaskar
>> <skb99@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This series add support for internal only per-CPU instructions,
>>> inlines the bpf_get_smp_processor_id() and bpf_get_current_task()
>>> helper calls for powerpc BPF JIT.
>>>
>>
>> This is marked for bpf-next tree, but I think this should actually go
>> through ppc64-specific tree, is that right?
>
> Yeah.
> Maddy, can you pick it via powerpc tree?
Yep, will pull this via powerpc tree.
Maddy
>
> - Hari
Powered by blists - more mailing lists