[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251217014552.GC148079@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 21:45:52 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@...dia.com>,
Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@...dia.com>,
Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/ucma: fix rdma_ucm_query_ib_service_resp struct
padding
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 02:33:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_user_cm.h b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_user_cm.h
> index 5ded174687ee..8e1d584f6633 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_user_cm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_user_cm.h
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct rdma_ucm_query_path_resp {
>
> struct rdma_ucm_query_ib_service_resp {
> __u32 num_service_recs;
> + __u32 :32;
> struct ib_user_service_rec recs[];
> };
RDMA doesn't use bitfields here, I changed these to be reserved like
the others.
> @@ -362,6 +363,7 @@ struct rdma_ucm_ib_service {
>
> struct rdma_ucm_resolve_ib_service {
> __u32 id;
> + __u32 :32;
> struct rdma_ucm_ib_service ibs;
> };
And I added the missing
struct rdma_ucm_ib_service {
- __u64 service_id;
+ __aligned_u64 service_id;
Again, like the others.
Applied to for-rc thanks
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists