[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29830128-8b75-4c57-ac55-0158f3688f12@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:38:39 +0100
From: johannes.goede@....qualcomm.com
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Kenneth Crudup <kenny@...ix.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] software node: Also support referencing non-constant
software nodes
Hi Danilo,
On 19-Dec-25 16:11, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri Dec 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM CET, johannes.goede wrote:
>> Since this fixes a 6.19 regression: Can someone please submit
>> a pull-request with "[GIT FIXES for v6.19]" pull-request to
>> Hans + Mauro with this patch?
>
> This code is maintained throught the driver-core tree and fixes for the current
> release cycle ending up in this tree will be sent to Linus directly for the next
> appropriate -rc.
>
> Is there any specific reason for this request?
No reason other then me not paying attention and since this fixes
an issue related to IPU6 cameras I typed the above on auto-pilot,
my bad.
You're completely right this should go upstream through driver core
and my request makes no sense, sorry.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists