[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7075845.DvuYhMxLoT@nukework.gtech>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 12:40:19 -0600
From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
To: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,ipq8074-wcss-pil: convert to DT
schema
On Friday, December 19, 2025 8:52:51 AM CST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/12/2025 05:34, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> > Convert the QCS404 and IPQ WCSS Peripheral Image Loader bindings to DT
> > schema. The text bindngs incorrectly implied that IPQ8074 needs only
> > one qcom,smem-states entry. This is only true for QCS404. IPQ8074
> > requires both "stop" and "shutdown".
> >
> > The example is to be added in a subsequent commit that adds the
> > IPQ9574 binding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
>
> > I used my name as a placeholder for the "maintainer" field. Krzysztof
> > mentioned to get the "SOC maintainer" using get_maintainer. I don't
> > know how to do that, and I don't see anyone listed for QCS404,
> > IPQ8074, or IPQ9574. The bindings apply to any of those SOCs.
>
> the soc DTSI file
Thank you Krzysztof! That's exactly what I needed to know
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists