lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251222-funny-aspiring-seal-05c4ae@quoll>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:09:08 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Harini T <harini.t@....com>
Cc: jassisinghbrar@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, michal.simek@....com, shubhrajyoti.datta@....com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	git@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mailbox: xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox: Document
 msg region requirement

On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 10:16:53AM +0530, Harini T wrote:
> Add description clarifying that for Versal IPI mailboxes, both host and
> remote agents must have the "msg" register region defined for successful
> message passing. Without both, only notification-based communication
> works.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harini T <harini.t@....com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/mailbox/xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.yaml           | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.yaml
> index 04d6473d666f..8fdf77c7935c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.yaml
> @@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ allOf:
>          reg-names: false
>  
>      else:
> +      description:

Else block cannot have description.

> +        For Versal IPI mailboxes, the "msg" register region is optional.

So it is optional...

> +        However, for successful message passing via mailbox, both the host IPI

And it is not optional. If nothing works, then it is not optional.

And why would it be optional in the first place? You generate your same
IP with different settings?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ